Office of Research and Innovation
University of Louisville
Louisville, Ky. 40202
502.852.6512, 502.852.2594 (Fax)
Looking for a unit within the Office of Research and Innovation? Contact information here.
Before submission to an external funding agency, all UofL proposals must be reviewed and have the appropriate approvals. The review process includes review by the department chair/unit head, the respective dean or designee and potential review and approval by university compliance offices/committees, such as the Human Subjects Protection Program/Institutional Review Board (IRB) and Animal Use/Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).
The following documents are required for review:
Review and approval by the Office of Sponsored Programs Administration is the final step in the process prior to proposal submission. Proposals are submitted by the institution on behalf of the principal investigator (PI). In the event that the sponsoring agency allows the PI to directly submit, a fully signed copy of the PCF is required prior to submission.
The complete package (final version of proposal and signed PCF) should be submitted via iRIS. More information is available in the UofL Research Handbook.
Proposals for all sponsored activities (including research, training/education, public service, clinical research, and clinical trials/drug/device studies) must be submitted to the Office of Sponsored Programs Administration (OSPA), for review and approval prior to submission to the sponsor.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
For proposals that are required to be institutionally submitted (i.e., via OSPA to the sponsor, PIs must submit the entire completed and final proposal (in the form, if any, provided by the particular sponsor [e.g., nonprofit foundation application form; Grants.gov, NSF Research.gov, etc. if a federal submission]), inclusive of ALL sponsor- or agency-mandated components to OSPA five (5) full business days prior to the sponsoring agency’s deadline date. Submissions must be made through iRIS.
Examples of required documents include the institutional signature page, abstract, budget and budget justification narrative, data sharing plan, etc. For NIH proposals, the SF424 form must be included. These may be uploaded to the iRIS eProposal form.
If the iRIS Short Form is used instead of the eProposal, or if the PI’s or any collaborating department requires departmental signoff prior to submission to OPSA, a completed Proposal Clearance Form (PCF) signed by the principal investigators (PIs), co-investigators (Co-Is), faculty members, key personnel, department chair(s), dean(s) and/or appropriate unit head(s) should be submitted in addition to the proposal application/documents. Use the PCF/MIRA Additional Signature Page as required. If such additional individuals have not been named at the time of proposal, insert percent effort and title for the position, using “TBD” in place of individual’s name. Signatures of all such other participants will be required prior to the establishment of an award.
SBIR/STTR PROPOSALS: Only small business concerns are eligible applicants under the federal SBIR/STTR programs. Planned UofL subaward proposals to a small business concern are to be submitted for review to OSPA following the procedure above. Include the electronic version of the UofL-specific consortium/subcontractor pages of the electronic proposal that the small business concern will incorporate into its submission, along with the completed/signed PCF and associated attachments, as needed. If the UofL activities are not clearly identified in the small business concern’s overall technical statement of work, also provide to OSPA a UofL-specific statement of work. (NOTE: Please submit SBIR/STTR subaward proposals to OSPA sufficiently in advance of the federal deadline to allow OSPA review, as well as review and upload by the small business concern.)
For proposals to be submitted directly by the PI to the sponsor, PIs are required to submit, as applicable, any page requiring authorized university signature, all sponsor/agency form pages, an abstract/description of the UofL scope of work/project, budget (including all project personnel and percent effort), budget justification narrative, a copy of or web link to the sponsor’s program guidelines, and a contract if appropriate, to OSPA five (5) full business days prior to the sponsor’s deadline date. Submissions must be made through iRIS.
If the iRIS Short Form is used instead of the eProposal, or if the PI’s or any collaborating department requires departmental signoff prior to submission to OPSA, a completed Proposal Clearance Form (PCF) signed by the principal investigators (PIs), co-investigators (Co-Is), faculty members, key personnel, department chair(s), dean(s) and/or appropriate unit head(s) should be submitted in addition to the proposal application/documents. Use the PCF/MIRA Additional Signature Page as required. If such additional individuals have not been named at the time of proposal, insert percent effort and title for the position, using “TBD” in place of individual’s name. Signatures of all such other participants will be required prior to the establishment of an award.
NOTABLE SUBMISSION ISSUES:
An unfunded collaboration is a relationship where each party is independently funding its portion of a research project which is anticipated to achieve a common goal. As the name indicates, no funding is provided to the university by the other party. In general, unfunded collaborations should be reviewed carefully for the benefit to the university as well as the other party (e.g., to ensure public funds are not used for private gain). A formal written agreement may not always be needed dependent upon the nature of the collaborative project; however, it is usually advisable to document in writing the expected duties and responsibilities as well as document any risk or liability issues. If institutional approval is needed, a Proposal Clearance Form should be prepared in accordance with these instructions, and OSPA will review and negotiate the terms of such an agreement and sign it on behalf of ULRF.
In any case, the UofL PI should inform his/her department chair, dean, and/or unit head of all unfunded collaborations, and should contact the UofL Research Integrity Program if any conflict of interest exists. In addition, the funding source for UofL's participation in such collaborative work will need to be identified. If the funds are other than unrestricted (e.g., gift or departmental funds), it may be necessary to verify with the provider of the funds that such funds may be used for the collaboration.
Gifts are administered by the Development Office through the University of Louisville Foundation, Inc. and do not require preparation and submission of a Proposal Clearance Form. Guidance for determining if the project is a sponsored activity or a gift can be found in the UofL Guidelines for Designating Funding as a Gift or a Sponsored Program. You may consult with OSPA to ensure compliance with applicable university policies and procedures and to assist in answering questions regarding proper processing within the university.
FORM INSTRUCTIONS
(b) Indicate if the project will use the clinical services/resources or facilities of an affiliated entity/health-care provider: Norton Healthcare (NHC), Uof L Health, Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC). If yes, include a completed Clinical Attachment with your submission.
(c) Indicate if the project will involve specimens, tissues or personally identifiable (not de-identified as defined by HIPAA) data/information (human materials). If yes, include a completed Clinical Attachment. If your project will use “human materials” for which IRB review is required, remember to (i) include IRB review fee in your budget, and (ii) submit the appropriate documents to the IRB in adequate time to have needed approvals by the time of award.
(d) Indicate if human materials or other biological/chemical materials are being received by the university from another entity or if we are sending such from the university to another entity.
Please note:
When completing the budget section, please include the amounts for the ENTIRE PERIOD OF THE PROPOSAL (unless otherwise directed by the sponsor). As a result it will not be necessary to complete a new PCF each year of the funded project. Once the PI(s), chair(s), and appropriate dean(s) and/or unit head(s) approve the initial proposal, their approvals are not necessary for subsequent years unless changes to budget, percent effort, personnel, etc. are later required.
(a) Indicate previously assigned chartfield number (e.g., OGMB/OGMN number) if proposal is for a renewal, continuation or supplement of an existing award or contract.
(b) If the department ID number for budget, expenditure and procurement purposes is different from the primary appointment of the PI, it must be listed.
(c) Budget Period – Indicate the timeframe (month/day/year) for which the funds are requested. If the grant period is more than one year, include all years.
(d) Requested from Sponsor – Direct Costs: Budget categories should include all direct cost amounts requested from the sponsor. Provide amounts for the following budget pool categories as applicable:
BUDGET CATEGORIES | BUDGET POOL | SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS |
---|---|---|
Salary & Wages | 511000 | |
Fringe Benefits | 512000 | |
Equipment > $5K per item | 190000 | List equipment costing less than $5,000 per item under Supplies & Expense |
Alteration/Renovation > $100K | 190000 | Cost revisions which cause budget to fall below $100K threshold per project (e.g., final cost is only $99K, or two separate renovation projects total $50K each) will disqualify project as a capitalized expense and will incur F&A when spent |
Subawards < $25K | 545295 | List the cumulative total up to the first $25,000 for all subawards; identify subawards individually in Item 19; any subcontracts should be listed as Supplies & Expense 519000 |
Subawards > $25K | 545297 | List the cumulative total of amounts over $25,000 for all subawards |
Supplies & Expense | 519000 | |
Travel | 535000 | |
Tuition | 520000 | |
Participant Support | 520000 |
(e) Add the amounts identified in 18d. The sum of these categorized amounts is the total direct cost (TDC) base.
See full explanation of F&A costs and related budget issues at F&A Indirect Costs
(f) UofL Cost Share—Cost sharing must be identified if: Sponsor requires specific university matching; time and effort of university personnel on the project is not allowed by the sponsor; salary being requested is not equivalent to committed effort; university cost sharing is committed in the narrative of the proposal. Include foregone F&A that would otherwise have been recovered had the direct cost amounts not been cost shared. The PI must provide justification for all cost sharing identified in the proposal. Indicate the speedtype from which each cost share category will be paid.
NOTE: Due to federal rules all committed cost sharing identified in the proposal to the sponsor must be separately budgeted and accounted for. Non-mandatory cost sharing should not be committed.
Budget categories should include amounts of in-kind or new funds needed for the project. The source of these funds must be identified by speedtype number. In-kind funds are those already available for the project. New funds are new dollars from UofL sources not currently available, but approved for this project. See the university's policy concerning the Tuition Remission Cost Sharing for GRA on grants and contracts. If there is a third-party cost share, please enter name of entity, type of cost sharing, and amount in budget remarks section. Also, submit with the PCF written confirmation of the agreement FROM the third party. ANY COST SHARING MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE APPROPRIATE UNIVERSITY OFFICIAL PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION TO THE OUTSIDE AGENCY.
(g) Exclusions to TDC Base – List any direct costs that have been included in the amounts in section 18d that are not subject to facilities & administrative (F&A) charges. Be sure to explain any items under the Other category.
(h) Add the amounts identified in 18g to show total exclusions.
(i) Subtract the sum of these exclusions (18h) from the total direct costs (18e). The result is the modified total direct cost (MTDC) base.
(j) F&A – List the F&A rate applicable to this project. Multiply the TDC base (18e) or MTDC base (18i), as applicable, by the F&A rate to show the amount of F&A costs. Note: Typically only industry clinical projects or projects utilizing a published and uniformly applied indirect rate that is less than our federally negotiated rate are eligible to use the TDC base in calculating F&A.
Select the appropriate F&A type from the dropdown menu. Choose from Organized Research, Instruction, Other Sponsored Activities, Industry Clinical.
Select the appropriate F&A base from the dropdown menu. Choose from Modified Total Direct Cost (MTDC), Total Direct Cost (TDC), Industry Direct Clinical (IDC), Other.
(k) Total Cost of Project – Add the TDC base from 18e and the F&A amount from 18j to show the total cost of the project. Provide totals for sponsored funds as well as cost-shared amounts.
A checkbox is provided to indicate the PI’s request to set up the budget within the PeopleSoft financial system as a lump sum rather than broken down by category. This option is available for projects funded by nonfederal sponsors that do not limit spending to budget categories and do not require approval for variances from proposed budgets. Note: This option is not applicable to NIH modular budgets.
(l) Budget Remarks: Please comment on any cost share or third-party match, on any nonstandard F&A items, and on any budget item requiring explanation or justification.