1. microaggressions and microresistance;
2. history of racism and systemic racism across multiple systems; and
3. macro change strategies.

1. What is the general effectiveness of a psychoeducation group on anti-racism to promote immediate and sustained change in relevant knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors?
2. What is the relative effectiveness of anti-racism psychoeducation groups by member racial composition, comparing homogenous (groups with members of the same race) with heterogeneous (groups with members of different races) groups?
3. What is the relative effectiveness of anti-racism psychoeducation groups for different target audiences, including students, staff, or faculty from the University of Louisville?

CFCWB will be assisting in the implementation of eCBT and in the evaluation of services and the assessment of facilitators and barriers to implementation. Mixed-method approaches to evaluation are utilized, including surveys, validated scales, interviews, and focus groups.

Jefferson County Family Recovery Court

Access JFRC Evaluation Tools

The CFCWB will: 1. operationalize outcome measures and data collection methods. CFCWB will work with Recovery Court to confirm or modify these outcome measures as needed, as well as to determine specific methods to be used to collect these data elements. This will include training of staff in data collection, putting measures on-line if applicable, and developing data collection manuals; 2. Manage data collection processes with data elements coming from multiple sources (different providers/agencies, administrative data, chart file review, etc). This will also serve to monitor fidelity of data collection; 3. Analyze outcome data and produce reports for various audiences.

Evaluation Implementation in collaboration between:

• Center for Family Community Well-Being (CFCWB), Kent School of Social Work, University of Louisville
• Seven Counties Services
• KY Cabinet for Health and Family Services

Eastern Kentucky Family Recovery Court

The Department of Justice, Office for Victims of Crime, will fund projects to provide direct services to child victims of crime due to addiction. The Family Recovery Court model serves this target population, as it provides comprehensive services to families with substance use issues and substantiated cases of child maltreatment. The funding announcement has priority areas of 1)rural areas (2) high poverty areas and 3) Empowerment Zones. There is a strong emphasis on the direct provision of evidence-based services to children. We will utilize the funds to sustain the Jefferson County Family Recovery Court (high poverty and Empowerment Zone priority areas) in partnership with Seven Counties and to establish the Clay County Recovery Court (rural priority area) in partnership with VOA. We will also partner with these and other agencies to build capacity to provide three evidence-based services that have documented effectiveness with victims of child maltreatment: trauma focused cognitive behavioral therapy (TFCBT), combined parent child cognitive behavioral therapy (CPC CBT), and telehealth. Additional activities of the grant will include manualization and training of the Recovery Court model for the new site, training and fidelity monitoring for the EBPs for children, comprehensive program evaluation, and dissemination activities. Jefferson Family Recovery Court serves approximately 70 families per year with approximately 100 children; the anticipated sample size for Clay County Family Recovery Court is 35 families with approximately 87 children per year. With two years of active enrollment for the study, the projected sample size is 210 parents and 320 children.

Key Assets has negotiated a contact with the CFCWB to do the following:
• Operationalization of outcome measures and data collection methods;
• Analysis of outcome data and reporting for various audiences; and
• Administrative oversight, advanced analytics and collaborative research development.

Legal Aid has partnered with the CFCWB to conduct a comprehensive needs assessment which includes focus groups and interviews, survey of existing/former clients, and a community outreach survey in order to identify needs and gaps in services that the organization may address.

Maryhurst is working to improve outcome measures for their electronic health records system, post-discharge data collection, standardized assessment data from the CANS process, and specialized program outcomes. This effort to improve data operationalization, collection, and analysis can enhance the overall quality of care and effectiveness of programming for youth.

Using data collected by Maryhurst staff, the Center for Family and Community Well-Being will analyze various outcomes regarding process evaluation, safety, permanency, well-being and organizational culture and climate.

PCAK has negotiated a contract with the CFCWB to do the following: 1. Review of existing data analysis and reports; 2. Advanced analytics and addition al report development; 3. Training of PCAK staff in data analysis and reporting.

The evaluation team will assess changes in client outcomes in relation to general wellbeing, clinical trauma symptoms, experiences with discrimination, and protective factors. The evaluation team will also assess client adverse childhood experiences at the onset of treatment, as well as satisfaction with services at the end of treatment.