hudson.JPG (11805 bytes)
J. Blaine Hudson, assistant professor in
Pan-African studies at U of L.

Race Relations in the Late Twentieth Century
Toward Pluralism
By J. Blaine Hudson

 

 

Since the end of slavery, the fundamental issue in American race relations can be reduced to a simple question: If Americans of African descent can no longer be enslaved, what will their status be? This question should have had an equally simple answer: Freedom should have the same meaning for all American citizens, irrespective of their race. However, the actual answer was far from simple as the promise of emancipation was betrayed by the creation of a segregated and unequal society—leaving African Americans, in the words of President James A. Garfield in 1881, on the "middle ground between slavery and freedom."

This dilemma has permeated the history of Louisville from the moment George Rogers Clark set foot on Corn Island in May 1778 to the last years of this century. Before the Civil War, enslaved African Americans were property subject to coercive white control. In this context, it is not surprising that Cato Watts, Louisville’s legendary first black resident, was also its first citizen to be executed (for killing his master). Non-slave African Americans were marginalized, with few rights, few opportunities, no power, and no protection from violence, and emancipation simply extended this marginal status to all African Americans. Today, reactions to President Clinton’s "National Dialogue on Race" reveal that this middle ground remains a fact of American life.


In a society of groups, African Americans must pursue and can achieve equality only as a group, through pluralism—not solely as individuals and not as though they were an independent nation. To do so, African Americans must establish private organizations and institutions to preserve group identity and cultural traditions, and to serve instrumental purposes in the struggle for political, economic, and educational equality.


From the perspective of most white Americans, this inequality was natural, unobjectionable, and beneficial, and race relations were good since segregation rendered African Americans safely invisible. However, African Americans saw segregation for what it was—not some benign system of racial accommodation, but a blatant and degrading attempt to maintain white privilege—and responded by initiating a continuing struggle for equality and empowerment. The record of this struggle is mixed, and is often confused as much by wishful thinking as by theories of culture and race that conflict with historical facts, the findings of modern science, or even basic common sense.

The United States is no longer a legally segregated society. Formal and informal contacts between black and white Americans now occur with unprecedented frequency and often evolve into personal relationships. Unlike in past generations, African Americans are no longer limited to low status "Negro jobs" in the larger economy or to business and professional niches in their segregated communities. Clearly, patterns of inter-racial social relations have changed for many Americans. Yet, most Americans still live in racially segregated neighborhoods. Children of all races attend non-segregated public schools, but usually find themselves grouped or "tracked" into racially identifiable classes or magnet programs. African Americans are still half as likely to graduate from college, three to four times more likely to be unemployed and, if employed, to earn lower wages than (ca. 60 percent) and to hold positions subordinate to whites. African Americans remain vulnerable to discriminatory and often brutal treatment by police and the courts—and to racial profiling by businesses and in public spaces. Recent incidents at Texaco and other corporations indicate that racism is as common in high places as in low and that attacks on affirmative action are simply thinly veiled attempts to limit equal opportunity. Despite these obvious examples of inequality, many Americans still believe that race has "declined in significance" as a national issue.

For many African Americans, the embeddedness of racism and inequality raises grave doubts as to the possibility of integration and heightens the appeal of separatist or nationalist philosophies. In my view, these alternative philosophies may be valid psychologically, but to have practical applicability must be reformulated to fit the conditions facing African Americans in this place and time. In a society of groups, African Americans must pursue and can achieve equality only as a group, through pluralism—not solely as individuals and not as though they were an independent nation. To do so, African Americans must establish private organizations and institutions to preserve group identity and cultural traditions, and to serve instrumental purposes in the struggle for political, economic, and educational equality. Through such structures, African Americans must also form alliances with other people of color nationally and internationally, and with whites committed to racial justice. In other words, African Americans must pursue all the rights and opportunities associated with American citizenship, while rejecting discrimination and the sexism and classism so common among white Americans. African Americans must also insist on the freedom to be as integrated or as self-segregated as they choose in those domains of life where such choices make sense. And, as Frederick Douglass stated in 1894, white Americans must "live up to their own Constitution" and move beyond lip service to action and institutional change.

A society in which race has no meaning may not evolve for centuries and African Americans cannot wait for all whites to have a change of heart and mind. However, racial diversity and racial equality need not be incompatible. Race relations in the American future will depend on whether this "either-or" can become a "both-and" proposition.

Recognizing these problems, a group of local African Americans developed an "African American Strategic Plan," completed in January 1998, focusing on the need to address inequalities in education, economic development, employment, wealth-building, and health and social wellness, including drugs and crime. It is a sad but telling irony that many of the same issues were raised by African Americans in 1866.

J. Blaine Hudson is an assistant professor in the Department of Pan-African Studies at U of L. His teaching and research interests are race, education, and the history of persons of African descent throughout the world.


"Front & Center" is a collaborative effort between UofL Magazine and the Kentucky Center for Public Issues to focus attention on issues of concern throughout the Commonwealth. KCPI is an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit public-policy organization that is partnering with the university to enhance a shared mission to offer information, expertise, and opportunities for the public to learn about and discuss issues affecting Kentuckians.


 

The Kentucky Center for Public Issues is an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit public-policy organization based in Frankfort, Kentucky's capital. KCPI has teamed up with the University of Louisville to provide internships for students and faculty, to identify and coordinate research projects, and to develop public affairs programs. The overall purpose of the partnership is to enhance a shared mission to serve Kentucky by offering information, expertise, and opportunities for the public to learn about and discuss issues of concern throughout the Commonwealth.

../graphics/footer3.gif (5198 bytes)