The existing systems have become costly to maintain and lack flexibility to keep up with the changing requirements and business processes; furthermore, the majority of these systems are not Year 2000 compliant.
Recognizing these factors, the university conducted a software evaluation and selected PeopleSoft as a replacement for the Human Resources and Student Administration systems. Cambridge Technology Partners was selected as the integration partner to assist with the implementation of the system and the re-design of these processes.
The Scoping Process |
A joint U of L/CTP team conducted a four week scoping analysis to
assess the Human Resources / Student Administration processes
across the following dimensions:
Process Flow Analysis - high-level work flows that illustrate the operations of the Human Resources, and Student Administration business processes. Functionality Analysis - A map of the business processes to their associated functions; includes lower level detail to identify required functionality. Benefits Analysis - For each function identified benefits as High, Medium, or Low. Package Functionality Assessment - Degree of fit between functionality required and PeopleSoft capabilities. Implementation Strategy - An overall implementation
strategy: phasing, prototyping workplans, prototyping
calendars, and support infrastructure. |
Strategic Context |
The following project strategic drivers were identified which
support the long term goals and strategies of the university.
Strategic Allocation of Resources People must be relieved of the clerical drudgery imbedded in the current systems and processes and be allowed to focus on high impact, pro-active tasks that will move the university towards its strategic goals. Service Excellence By providing a technical basis for process re-engineering, Project ORION must allow the university to provide previously unavailable levels of service. The Right Information, Available To The Right People, At The Right Time Accurate information must be made accessible to decision makers in the right format and on a timely basis to allow them to monitor, control, and respond to the effectiveness of their programs. |
Critical Success Factors |
|
| Implementation Plan | The project will be executed in two major phases:
Foundation phase - focusing on the replacement of the aging HR and Student Administration systems to address the Year 2000 problems Enrichment Phase - building on the foundation systems through more aggressive process re-engineering and implementation of more sophisticated enabling technologies |
Foundation Phase |
This phase will be executed over the next 21 months and will
achieve the following:
Implementation of PeopleSoft base modules: Student Administration
HRMS
Establishment of PeopleSoft technical infrastructure Touch Tone Services Centralized Graphical Reporting Opportunistic process re-engineering Replacement of targeted shadow systems |
Organizational Scope for Foundation Phase |
The foundation phase will address the in-scope functionality for
the following organizations:
Student Administration Undergraduate and graduate colleges Professional schools: Medical, Dental, Law |
| Employee Groups in Scope for Foundation Phase | The foundation phase will address the in-scope functionality for
the following employee groups:
HRMS
|
Enrichment Phase |
This phase will be executed over the succeeding 24 months and
will build on the foundation phase to achieve the following:
|
Project Milestones |
Scope Phase Completed 12/1/97
HRMS Prototype Completed 4/27/98
SAS Prototype Completed 5/14/98 Student Records Go Live 11/2/98 Financial Aid Go Live 1/1/99 HR/Payroll Go Live 1/1/99 Admissions Go Live 2/1/99 Salary Admin Go Live 4/1/99 Time and Labor Go Live 4/1/99 Student Financials Go Live 7/1/99 Benefits Admin Go Live 7/1/99 |
Next Steps |
1. Execute the Business Process Prototype activities:
2. Upgrade to PeopleSoft release 7 |
| Risk | Abatement Strategy |
| Delays in Release 7 upgrade | Develop a very detailed, aggressive upgrade plan to commence at the
earliest possible start date
Acquire targeted consulting expertise to assist with upgrade |
| Impact of parallel initiatives | Identify specific project dependency dates
Establish explicit liaison responsibilities Monitor parallel initiative progress for project impact |
| Loss of key personnel | Evaluate project team members for risk of leaving and potential project
impact
Design program for enhancing non-monetary motivators Establish contingency / succession plans Begin assimilation of back-up resources |
Vision |
An analysis session was conducted with the University executives
to understand the strategic context of Project Orion relative to
other major strategic initiatives underway. The discussion focused
on project strategic drivers which support the long term goals and
strategies of the university.
Strategic Allocation of Resources In order for the university to maximize the value of the administrative functions, people must be relieved of the clerical drudgery imbedded in the current systems and processes and be allowed to focus on high impact, pro-active tasks that will move the university towards it's strategic goals. Because of the lack of integration and functionality in current systems, administrative processes are inordinately clerical and labor intensive. Excessive effort is spent on manual error checking, error correction, duplicate data entry, reconciling information in redundant systems, and manually collecting, manipulating, and analyzing data. Project ORION must enable administrative resources to focus on more strategic activities by proving a single integrated database for HR and Student Administration information. The PeopleSoft system will serve as an enabling technology to allow business processes to be re-engineered and extended to the source of data on input and to the consumer of the information on output. Staff reduction is not an objective of Project Orion; however, excess staff capacity may be identified as part of the process re-engineering effort. In order for the University to achieve it's overall strategic initiatives, these resources must be re-allocated to more strategic activities both within and across functions. Service Excellence The higher education environment is becoming more competitive. Students, prospects, faculty, and employees expect much higher levels of service from top tier universities. In order for the University to reach it's goals, it must be able to provide a high level of service excellence to both internal ant external customers. Even with the talents, dedication, and hard work of the administrative staff, the current systems and processes lack the functionality and flexibility to keep up with changing requirements needed to provide efficient services to students, employees, and the rest of the university community. By providing a technical basis for process re-engineering, project Orion will allow the University to provide previously unavailable levels of service. Service will be improved through more streamlined processes, better access to more timely and accurate information, and more administrative staff capacity available to focus on valued services vs. clerical activities. |
| Project Expectations | The following project expectations were built through working
sessions with the university executives and the members of the
Project Orion team. The purpose of this list is to provide project
participants with a sounding mechanism with which to gauge
project success. These will be revisited through-out the project to
ensure adherence and/or ongoing applicability.
|
| Critical Success Factors | The following critical success factors were built through working
sessions with the university executives and the members of the
Project ORION team. The purpose of this list is to define project
elements which, if present, will likely result in project success.
These will be revisited through-out the project to ensure
adherence and/or ongoing applicability.
|
| Guiding Principles | The following guiding principles were built through working
sessions with the university executives and the members of the
Project Orion team. The purpose of this list is to provide project
participants with a set of principles they can use to guide them in
tactical decision making through the life of the project. These will
be revisited through-out the project to ensure adherence and/or an
ongoing focus on making the system work as delivered (minimize
modifications)
|
Overview |
A detailed implementation plan was created based on the data gathered during the scoping process. The implementation plan shows the schedule for Human Resources and Student Administration prototyping, deployment and production sub phases for the foundation phase of Project Orion. The prototype sub phase is for a fixed time period. The deployment and production sub phase remains an estimate at this time. Additional data, at a more detailed level, will be gathered during the prototyping sub phase which could change the deployment and production sub phases estimates. At the completion of the prototype sub phase, a more detailed implementation plan will be created to further define the deployment and production sub phases. |
| Prototype | The prototype sub phase is broken up into three tasks: Campus Community and
Academic Structure, Human Resources and Student Administration. The prototype
begins December 1, 1997 with joint sessions conducted with Human Resources and
Student Administration members discussing Campus Community. Human
Resources begins on December 8, 1997 while Campus Community and Academic
Structure continues for Student Administration. Human Resources is scheduled to
complete by April 27, 1998 and Student Administration is scheduled to complete by
May 18, 1998.
A detailed prototyping schedule for Human Resources and Student Administration will be available for all Project Orion members. |
Deployment |
The deployment sub phases is broken up into four tasks: Development, Testing,
User Procedures and Training. This sub phase will be managed by the University.
It is anticipated that the University will utilize two Cambridge Technology Partners
technical consultants during the Deployment sub phase. The deployment sub phase
is scheduled to begin on March 6, 1998 and end on June 23, 1999.
The development task consists of creating data conversions, interfaces, reports and further enhancing and customizing the PeopleSoft Human Resources and Student Administration systems to meet the Universities requirements. The testing task consists of technical and functional personnel testing the data conversions, interfaces, reports, enhancements and customizations in a controlled manner to ensure that the system is meeting the needs of the University. During the testing, scenarios will be created to ensure the results. The user procedures task is the creation of user procedures and documenting the data conversions, interfaces, reports, enhancements and customizations that were created during the development task. The training task is the task to train all functional users in how to use the system. PeopleSoft educational classes will be utilized as well as the user procedures developed during the user procedures task as well as existing PeopleSoft documentation. |
| Production | The production sub phase is bringing various parts of the system, in a phased
approach, live for the University to begin using the PeopleSoft system. These dates
were based on discussions with the Project Orion team members during the scoping.
Student Administration modules were split amongst themselves to have certain parts live before other parts. This is detailed as Student Records I which is building courses and classes and Financials I which is the setup of Item Type data. The remainder of Student Records and Financials will be completed at a later date according the plan. |
| Task | Total Effort (hours) | Total Work Days | Total Work Weeks | Total for Module (Weeks) | Total for Module (Days) | |
| Recruiting & Admissions | Customizations | 303.60 | 37.95 | 7.59 | ||
| Reports | 246.00 | 30.75 | 6.15 | |||
| Interfaces | 466.40 | 58.30 | 11.66 | |||
| Conversions | 248.80 | 31.10 | 6.22 | 31.62 | 158.10 | |
| Financial Aid | Customizations | 759.00 | 94.88 | 18.98 | ||
| Reports | 246.00 | 30.75 | 6.15 | |||
| Interfaces | 466.40 | 58.30 | 11.66 | |||
| Conversions | 122.40 | 15.30 | 3.06 | 39.85 | 199.23 | |
| Student Records | Customizations | 825.00 | 103.13 | 20.63 | ||
| Reports | 246.00 | 30.75 | 6.15 | |||
| Interfaces | 466.40 | 58.30 | 11.66 | |||
| Conversions | 373.20 | 46.65 | 9.33 | 47.77 | 238.83 | |
| Student Financials | Customizations | 132.00 | 16.50 | 3.30 | ||
| Reports | 246.00 | 30.75 | 6.15 | |||
| Interfaces | 466.40 | 58.30 | 11.66 | |||
| Conversions | 311.00 | 38.88 | 7.78 | 28.89 | 144.43 | |
| Human Resources | Customizations | 595.20 | 74.40 | 14.88 | ||
| Reports | 328.00 | 41.00 | 8.20 | |||
| Interfaces | 169.60 | 21.20 | 4.24 | |||
| Conversions | 795.60 | 99.45 | 19.89 | 47.21 | 236.05 |