|
1. Nineteen ninety-eight will be a critical year for Indiana University's
Graduate Employees' Union (GEU). We are on the verge of a new stage in our
organization campaign and we are optimistic about our prospects. Of course
for any union, especially one with such a transient -- and often skeptical --
constituency every year is critical, but this year will either see the GEU show that it can be a viable participant in campus governance -- or that we are far away from achieving such
viability.
2. The GEU is the recently renamed Graduate Employees Association, a
student organization at Indiana University (IU) whose history dates back
to 1989. At that time graduate teachers (Associate Instructors, or AIs)
were unhappy with their lack of medical insurance. The university
maintained the fiction (and they maintain it still today) that graduate
teachers are not employees and therefore do not deserve benefits.
Strangely, graduate employees get ill nonetheless; some people might even
go so far as to credit the workload and strain of graduate school as a
cause of such illness. In 1989, a dedicated group of activists, calling
themselves the Graduate Employee's Association (GEA), organized their
colleagues around this issue and won a subsidized medical insurance plan
for Student Academic Appointees (SAAs--a term covering AIs and other
graduate students appointed to certain positions in the university
structure, mostly but not always, having to do with teaching or research).
The plan still exists today and has been improved, with graduate student
consultation. Legally, all beneficiaries
of this self-funded plan must be employees of the
university. The GEA dissolved after it realized its primary goal.
3. Over the past three years the GEA has revived. A new group of
activists has recruited members, raised the visibility of the
organization, forged bonds with the Graduate Student Organization (the
representative student government body sponsored by the Graduate School)
revised the organization's by-laws and joined the Communications Workers
of America (CWA). Much of that core group has left, finding jobs
and other lives and leaving a handful of members to try to prevent the
disappearance of the GEA.
4. Without the ability to collect dues and bargain with the
university, creating a real presence on campus has been a struggle. The
issues that should unite graduate students in attempting to better their
lives here and prepare them for governance when they get academic jobs,
often serve to divide them. Professors, burdened with teaching, research
and governance duties, allow their advisees to dream of a future where
research is primary, teaching wholly secondary, and governance is an
afterthought.
5. In the past two years, the GEU (once GEA) has researched and
negotiated a very important agreement with Local 4730 of the
Communications Workers of America (which represents the clerical workers
at IU) whereby the members of the GEU will be members in good standing of
Local 4730 and will benefit from their own sub-local to deal with issues
that do not concern the clerical workers. This arrangement benefits both
groups; the clerical workers and the CWA offer stability and visibility,
which the graduate students currently lack. The graduate students will
increase the numbers of the local and broaden the talent pool of the
membership.
6. Though Indiana is a right-to-work state and the climate in the
state as well as in the university is hostile to unions, the clerical
workers have made some progress in negotiating better working conditions.
It is our understanding that the GEU must be prepared to negotiate with
little if any protection from labor law, but it encourages us that the CWA
has experienced success in this state which other unions have abandoned
for greener organizational pastures. The association with the CWA has necessitated changes to
the GEU's by-laws, so a committee studied the old by-laws and
those of other graduate student unions and proposed a new set.
These by-laws were adopted all but unanimously at a meeting last
year,
as was our affiliation with the CWA.
which was, along with the association with the CWA, adopted all but
unanimously at a meeting last year.
7. The next step for us is to sign up members and collect dues, but
the university, after delaying as long as possible, has refused to deduct
dues from graduate employees' pay on the pretext that graduate students
are not employees. Because dues are fixed as a percentage of pay by the
CWA constitution, the GEU has little latitude in what to charge and how to
charge it. Discussions and research of alternative methods of collecting
appropriate dues have occupied more time, and before a decision was
implemented, the former leadership departed.
8. Fortunately, while universities constantly lose senior activists,
they also constantly recruit new prospects and the GEU is happy to welcome
an enthusiastic corps of new officers, mostly from the English Department,
a traditional source of support for the union. We are finally ready to
start our dues-paying organization drive throughout the campus in the new
year.
9. There are two main categories of issues that face graduate
students at IU (and elsewhere), once we have the membership to address effectively them: economic issues (pay, fees, workload and working conditions
e.g.) and organization itself. We have adopted as our priority a living
wage for graduate employees. We also want more standardization in
compensation for graduate employees across the university, and more
honesty in evaluation of student workloads. At Indiana Bloomington,
graduate students do about half of the teaching. Official estimates of our workloads, as
reflected in our contracts, are entirely fictitious; departments
count courses
with 15 students the same as other departments count courses where
the AI is responsible for 50 or more. While duties also vary, there seems
to be no consistent attempt by the university to evaluate and compare the
actual work required by the various courses even in a single department or
school, let alone campus wide. In response, we have formulated a survey to
acquire data on the work loads of graduate student employees. We intend to
evaluate workloads and to demand that the university compensate us for the
work we actually do.
10. On top of the crushing workload of research and teaching and the
pressure of mounting loans and an uncertain professional future, the isolation brought
about by the transitory residency, disciplinary teritoriality, and the
romantic myth of the solitary scholar in the ivory tower,
demoralizes graduate students and hinders their ability
to organize.
11. Organization means overcoming this isolation, in itself a manifest good.
Even before the first union demand is made or
the first negotiation is undertaken, organization means making students
see their potential power. Realizing that you are not the
only one trying to eke out subsistence on loans and a second job can start
the metamorphosis from despair and guilt to anger and resistance. The
power of knowledge, facts accumulated by organized groups with
institutional memory, can arm graduate student participation in campus
governance, afford training for future "service" assignments and
materially benefit graduate students.
12. We realize that not all of the many frustrations graduate students
face are the result of malicious decisions by faculty or administrators,
or even of culpable negligence. The dynamic of universities' governing
committees seems to be that if we are not there, we will not be
represented, our desires will not be heard and our needs will not be
met. And that dynamic will not change once
we have our degrees and the coveted job. Negotiated contracts
are wonderful and equal participation in the bodies that dictate the
conditions under which we live and work is a valid goal, but
merely the right to be heard and the organization and knowledge
to have something to say can materially benefit all faculty--graduate
employees and professors--if they systematicly take advantage of it. The confidence and hope that such
small victories instill will motivate further action, leading to permanent
representative institutions and continuing negotiations to improve our
condition.
13. So we start the year optimistic, revitalized by new blood, ready
to start an organization drive to recruit new members and establish our
presence in all the departments and schools of the university.
Ed Fox and Curtis Anderson, Indiana University
|
by Ed Fox and
Curtis Anderson
|